Slime Legal Meaning

Some consumer groups have lobbied for the elimination of pink mud or mandatory disclosure of additives in beef,[5][26][51][110][111] but a spokesperson for Beef Products Inc. Because of this similarity, the dirt in C. S. Lewis`s words seems to be a metaphor for a disciple rather than a master. Evidence suggests that we may not be able to think of criminals without concepts such as mud, foam, and feces. In December 2009, an investigative article published by The New York Times questioned the safety of meat processed with this procedure, highlighting cases where process adjustments were not effective. [28] This article contained the first public use of the term “pink slime” as a pejorative word. [38] In January 2010, the New York Times published an editorial reiterating the concerns expressed in the news article and noting that no meat produced by BPI was linked to disease or epidemics. [39] Philosophers have long proclaimed the essential role of metaphors in the production of meaning. Words that say one thing and suggest another are necessary for the growth of our thinking and can be an inevitable aspect of language itself.

Nevertheless, metaphors can hinder understanding if we lose sight of their status as tropes and view them as reality. An umbrella term for any submission of a complaint (or petition) seeking redress through legal action, often referred to as a “lawsuit.” In common parlance, a lawsuit that requires a court order instead of a monetary judgment is often referred to as a “motion,” but technically it is a “fair suit.” (See: Trial) Pink mucus (also known as finely textured lean beef or LFTB,[1] finely structured beef[2] or boneless lean beef or BLBT[3]) is a meat by-product used as a food additive to ground meat and processed beef-based meat, as a filler or to reduce the total fat content of ground beef. [4] [5] As part of the production process, heat and centrifuges remove fat from meat in beef sections. [6] The resulting paste without the fat is exposed to ammonia gas or citric acid to kill bacteria. [6] In 2001, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) approved limited human consumption of the product. If the product is manufactured from ammonia, it is prohibited for human consumption in the European Union[7] and Canada. [8] [9] 1996 – paragraph q). L. 104-170, § 402 (a), paragraph (q) as generally amended. Prior to the amendment, paragraph (q) read as follows: “The term `chemical pesticide` means any substance which, alone, in chemical combination or formulation with one or more other substances, is `a pesticide` within the meaning of the Federal Act on Insecticides, Fungicides and Rodenticides, as currently in force or subsequently amended, and which is used in its manufacture; storage or transport of agricultural raw materials. Theoretical rather than practical considerations give these questions special appeal, for dirt is a concept of extraordinary wealth and power, an archetypal symbol whose roots lie deep in childhood, in the early warnings of parents and the primordial experiences of the body. Contradictory and paradoxical, dirt in its ultimate form of excrement unites radically opposite meanings.

On the one hand, it means insignificance: the abolition of all things to a homogeneous mass. On the other hand, as psychoanalysts teach us, excrement represents many good things: an artistic creation, a gift, a wealth. Mucus 1. Soft and moist soil or clay, with adhesive quality; Viscous sludge. As Nilus ebbs, the seedman scatters over the mucus and oozes its grain. (Shake) 2. mucilage; Any substance of a dirty, moist, soft and adhesive nature. 3. Bitumen. She had mud for mortar. (Gen. Xi.

3) 4. Sludges (Science: chemical) containing metal ore obtained in the preparatory bond. 5. (Science: Physiology) A mucus-like substance that escapes from the body of some animals. Hagfish. (Science: Zoology) See hag. Mucus pit, a pit to collect mucus or bitumen. Origin: OE.

Slim, AS. Slim; similar to D. Slijm, G. Schleim, MHG. Make slim to make smooth, Icel. Thin mucus, Dan. Sliim; cf. L.

Limare zu feilen, poliieren, levis glatt, Gr.; or cf. mud of L. Limus. After examining the big picture, the article in Part III offers a broad illustration, a case study in legal history: namely, the Botany Bay enterprise, Britain`s decision in 1786 to establish a penal colony in Australia, and its eighty-one year practice of banishing criminals to this remote continent. Australia`s history is full of descriptions of convicts as “sewage” and their island prison as a “pile of manure”, a “cesspool” and a “pit of wickedness”. In even more striking terms, Jeremy Bentham described Australia`s policy of transporting criminals as a projection of a “mass of excrement”. Despite the richness of these expressions, it is not because of the language I chose to analyze the Botany Bay experience, but because this episode represents a remarkable effort on the part of non-criminals – an effort to eliminate the relationship with criminals, reject the condemned altogether and treat them as if they were on another planet or distant star. 1998 — Paragraph (q)(1). L. 105-324, § 2 a), added para. 1) and deleted the old paragraphs.

(1) which reads as follows: “The term `chemical pesticide` means any substance that is a pesticide within the meaning of the Federal Act on Insecticides, Fungicides and Rodenticides, including all active and inert components of that pesticide.” Along the way to these conclusions, this article explores several paths of our topic, including the reasons why we associate evil with darkness, the relationship between crime and foul odors, and the fantasy that criminals are specifically made of soft, wet dirt or mud. In March 2012, an ABC News series on “pink slime” claimed that about 70% of ground beef sold in U.S. supermarkets at the time contained the additive. Some companies and organizations have stopped offering minced meat with the product. Some claimed that “pink mucus” was originally used as animal feed and cooking oil and later approved for public consumption,[10] but this was confirmed in April 2012 by the administrator of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), who was responsible for approving the product, and Beef Products, Inc. (BPI), the largest U.S. manufacturer of the additive. controversial. [11] [12] In September 2012, BPI filed a defamation lawsuit against ABC for making false statements about the product. [13] In 2017, BPI sought $1.9 billion in damages. [14] On June 28, 2017, ABC announced that it had settled the claim.

[15] The terms of the settlement were at least $177 million. [16] BPI`s lawyer believes that this is the highest amount ever paid in a media defamation case in the United States. [17] One of the most common metaphors in our culture is that of the criminal as dirt.